On 08/11/2016 06:54 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Jóhann B. Guðmundsson [11/08/2016 16:25] :
> Because you are exposing Fedora and the work of the server WG to a larger
> audience by doings so ( three upstream CM communities four if you add salt
> in the mix ).
I'm not sure why you would want to limit interactions between the server
WG and the upstream communities to these three (or four). A case can be argued
it's probably not useful to target communties whose software isn't present in
Fedora but excluding all but those four sounds like a waste of opportunity.
Let's interact with all of these. Some of these will react faster than others
but that's to their credit more than anything else.
You do realize I'm the one that has been advocate for all the extra
while some only want to stick only with Ansible right?
JBG