-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/08/2013 12:13 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
On 11/08/2013 10:33 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Not *exactly* (but this is pretty much exactly the graphic I was
> trying and failing to draw, so thank you for that). The
> "security fixes only" phase was going to start at N.3[1], not be
> from N.2 to N.3. The idea was for there to be an overlap period
> to allow stable deployments to migrate to N+1.
Okay what about this (you may have to shift-reload to get the new
version):
https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/1/12/Serverwg-proposal-serverlifecycl...
Almost...
I doubt very much there will ever be an actual N.4
release/roll-up. After N.3 it's just emergency-fixes only and people
should be planning their migration.
Thanks for putting these together, they paint a much clearer picture
of what I was trying to say.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlJ9HsUACgkQeiVVYja6o6NqZwCfZ2RwnxkTj0tLqrrvWxG/emAG
YD0AmwfKpkGv17oXP7peOHRNuDk56+Wl
=gNUT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----