On Mon, 2024-04-29 at 16:24 +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
And all the other options would also have to be revised. Why are "Web server" and „Infrastruktur server" mutually exclusive options, just one example from the list? And a "Fedora Server Edition" does not include a graphical user interface and certainly no "Games and Entertainment" or "VideoLan Client“. And non-applicable options do not belong in its option list for selection.
Basically: because nobody maintains this stuff.
It's not rocket science. It is all in https://pagure.io/fedora-comps . You can send pull requests. But people rarely do.
If I didn't go through it once a cycle and clean out stuff that's been retired it'd be even worse.
This applies to your issues 3 and 4. They are both controlled by the group and environment group definitions in comps.
You cannot have the same group listed as "Fedora Server Edition" on the Server netinst but not on the Everything netinst, because that's just...how the installer works. It reads the names out of the comps data.