On 10/31/2013 11:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 18:49 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On 10/31/2013 06:42 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> So, to give an alternative proposal: "Active participant in the server
>> WG" would be sufficiently targeted for me, simple enough (... and
>> equally unenforceable).
> +1 That seems fair to me. I think you'd have to have the experience to
> have the interest to actively participate anyway :)
+1 let's not burden ourselves too much with rules, when we'll see the
need we'll add them in due course.
+1 Let's get this over with and move to more important things
JBG