On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 13:36, Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 05:48:15PM +0100, Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> > servers also need security and bug fixes.
> If so and local repository is always needed ... why keep a server spin
> then? Why not install from Everything netinst?
Lots of people use Fedora in a server context. If we don't have a
server-focused deliverable, it's really easy for overall project decisions
to lean too far towards desktop use cases and not provide a balanced venue.
(See historical discussions on value of LVM in Fedora, for example.)
Then we are back to what Lukas brought up. What is the Server going to
have on it? I think the items he had were the ones most likely needed
out of the box:
a file server
- a print server
- a router
- a web server (for intranet)
So, my expectations would be that the package selection on DVD should
enable to set up any of those above scenarios via at least the most
standard way, so there should be at least:
- one database
- one http server
- one file serving program
- etc
Otherwise we are back to 'nothing' as making more sense because
clearly they can get those from the internet and we don't need to ship
them.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
server mailing list -- server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to server-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/server@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Stephen J Smoogen.