-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/2013 01:32 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 11/04/2013 06:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:06:03 +0000 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> <johannbg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think our primary delivery method would be ks preferable
>> fetchable from netinstall iso and stored in git ( that ks could
>> be read from a usb stick from anaconda as well ) as well as if
>> we cant apply your ansible/playbook proposal for it as well.
> Well, ks (and ansible playbooks, etc) are very flexable, possibly
> too flexable for this case. I suppose I could see basing things
> off some existing ks, but I really expect most server admins
> would tweak their own. Same for post install config...
>
> So, perhaps it's best for us to produce the underlying framework
> (possibly with a few examples) and test that and make sure it
> works so server admins can customize on top of that.
One of the problem with Fedora is that we are to generic but with
targeted products we can break away from that so I would actually
say we should produce the best out of the box optimized
ks/playbooks files for any given server product, reducing the steps
necessary to configure/tweak/optimize/scale/secure for
administrator to perform and get started.
^^^ THIS.
This is exactly what I've been trying to say with my 'roles'
discussions. So yes, I am in favor of this 100%.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlJ36zgACgkQeiVVYja6o6MUegCgk/v9c9uoocsJowwQXbovk3G5
m3sAoKCvzpIVHBvgY0O6YM2f93qpqy9o
=tkUD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----