On Fr September 7 2007, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Friday 07 September 2007, Till Maas wrote:
> On Do September 6 2007, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > I would personally call it python-fuse anyway for consistency, and
> > perhaps add "Provides: fuse-python = VR", but maybe that's just
me.
>
> Is doing it the other way round not good enough?
>
> Name: fuse-python
> Provides: python-fuse = VR
Good enough for whom? Both of those definitely satisfy the current naming
Good enough for a user, will there be any differences if one uses yum to
search for "fuse-python" or "python-fuse" or will both produce the
same
result?
Regards,
Till