Hi there!
I have a question about this review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Is it ok to havearched BuildRequires?
In my opinion they should NOT be arched, because of the reasons given in
the comments of the bug.
Cheers,
Björn
TIL that there are around a thousand packages
in Fedora that include a file named jquery.js... [1]
Anyway it is good to see efforts to tackle these kinds of problems
with the Javascript and Web Assets Guidelines. :)
I want to ask if the packaging of grunt and jquery
blocks current package reviews of packages that bundle jquery.js?
Or can they proceed for now until jquery is actually packaged in Fedora?
Jens
ps It is going to be a long cleanup process to fix all those packages with bundled files.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets#Web_application_packagers
Hi,
I can't attend the meeting this week. Also it seems to me IRC meeting is
not the best option for everyone. Not all of us can join in the evening
(or even worse night).
I add my comments to some question marks on Toshio's draft page. Current
draft is well written and should be usefull also for SCL beginners. My
biggest concern here is the naming propose. I don't want to create such
big incompatibility between downstreams. It would mean much more work
for all interested parties, maybe changes in scl-utils. I'm not sure why
it's needed in this format. Could someone elaborate?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_%28draft%29#Namin…
Thanks,
Marcela
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-10-31 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-10-31 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2013-10-31 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2013-10-31 16:00 Thu UTC <-
2013-10-31 16:00 Thu Europe/London <-
2013-10-31 17:00 Thu Europe/Paris CET
2013-10-31 17:00 Thu Europe/Berlin CET
2013-10-31 21:30 Thu Asia/Calcutta IST
------------------new day----------------------
2013-11-01 00:00 Fri Asia/Singapore SGT
2013-11-01 00:00 Fri Asia/Hong_Kong HKT
2013-11-01 01:00 Fri Asia/Tokyo JST
2013-11-01 02:00 Fri Australia/Brisbane EST
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12
= Followups =
#topic #339 software collections in Fedora
.fpc 339
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/339
#topic #352 BLAS and LAPACK packaging
.fpc 352
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/352
= New business =
#topic #355 How to package noarch packages which require a binary
dependency which doesn't build on all archs?
.fpc 355
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/355
#topic #357 time-api prior to openJDK8
.fpc 357
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/357
#topic #358 Please make some autotools guidelines.
.fpc 358
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/358
#topic #359 Guideline: Forbid sysv initscripts in addition to
systemd unit files
.fpc 359
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/359
#topic #361 Two more bundled MD5 implementations
.fpc 361
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/361
= Open Floor =
For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
report of the agenda items can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
the following meeting.
Dear FPC members,
due to time zone change across EU last weekend, I'm no longer able
to join the meetings at 16:00 UTC. Moving to 17:00 UTC would be
preferable.
Also, I'm not able to attend the meeting this Thursday anyway due
to travel.
Regards,
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
Hi all,
I like to swap some reviews. Have a look at my unassigned review tickets:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&component=Package%20…
The most important one is postscriptbarcode for the time being. It is a
requirement for Kbarcode, where it is bundled in the upstream tarball.
Please tell me what I can do in return. Note, I have no experience with Java
packages, so I won't be able to do a reasonable review.
Best Regards,
Mario
HI,
Recently opensmtpd is being reviewed, I want to know if we still need to add:
Provides: server(smtp)?
Thanks.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd оf нaт lїкє Яёd Haт.
http://cicku.me
Hello list!
I'm currently working on packaging some software, which builds SWIG'ed
mono-bindings and along to this I have some questions not being answered
by the Mono-guidelines [1]:
`make install` installs both into `/usr/lib/cli/%{name}. Which is the
proper location to install the build *.dll && *.so? The one `make
install` puts them? Shall they go into /usr/lib/%{name}? Shall they
be split between /usr/lib and %{_libdir}? Do the both go into
{_libdir}/name?
Is the resulting *.dll to be registered / installed with gacutil? Or
is Mono 'smart' enough to pick that up without, if in proper location?
I hope someone here may know the answer. :)
Cheers,
Björn
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono
======================
#fedora-meeting-1: fpc
======================
Meeting started by abadger1999 at 16:09:02 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-10-24/fedora-meeting…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* roll call (abadger1999, 16:09:08)
* SCLs (abadger1999, 16:12:13)
* SCL Approval section
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_(draft)#SCL_Appro…
(abadger1999, 16:20:38)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_(draft)#There_can…
<= updated (abadger1999, 16:27:42)
* ACTION: abadger1999 to keep plugging away at the draft -- goal for
next week is to approve the SCL Approval section. (abadger1999,
17:46:00)
Meeting ended at 17:59:31 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* abadger1999 to keep plugging away at the draft -- goal for next week
is to approve the SCL Approval section.
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* abadger1999
* abadger1999 to keep plugging away at the draft -- goal for next week
is to approve the SCL Approval section.
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* abadger1999 (112)
* RemiFedora (75)
* geppetto (49)
* mmaslano (10)
* Rathann (9)
* langdon (6)
* zodbot (4)
* spot (2)
* racor (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot