Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2019-02-28 17:00 - 17:35 UTC)
by James Antill
======================
#fedora-meeting-1: fpc
======================
Meeting started by geppetto at 17:01:16 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-02-28/fpc.2019-02...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (geppetto, 17:01:16)
* Schedule (geppetto, 17:07:01)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproje...
(geppetto, 17:07:04)
* #859 Scriptlet to replace a directory: try delete first? (geppetto,
17:07:17)
* Tibbs recommendations seem good (geppetto, 17:12:55)
* ACTION: Someone really needs to move that code into a macro.
(geppetto, 17:13:05)
* #719 Simplify packaging of forge-hosted projects (geppetto, 17:14:11)
* #845 Wiki deprecation status (geppetto, 17:16:37)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Packaging_guidelines
(mhroncok, 17:23:19)
* ACTION: Everybody please add links to new docs to guidelines lacking
them (mhroncok, 17:25:44)
* Open Floor (geppetto, 17:28:14)
Meeting ended at 17:35:01 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* Someone really needs to move that code into a macro.
* Everybody please add links to new docs to guidelines lacking them
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* Someone really needs to move that code into a macro.
* Everybody please add links to new docs to guidelines lacking them
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* geppetto (38)
* zodbot (16)
* tibbs (14)
* mhroncok (11)
* decathorpe (7)
* limburgher (2)
* ignatenkobrain (1)
* redi (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
4 years, 3 months
%autosetup and conditional packaging
by Sérgio Basto
Hi,
%autosetup -n GDCM-%{version} -S git -N
%patch1 -p1
%patch2 -p1
%patch3 -p1
%patch4 -p1
%patch5 -p1
%if 0%{?fedora} > 29
%patch6 -p1 -b .poppler.0.73.0
%endif
is this the correct way to apply one patch only in F30 ? , i.e.
I need patch6 not be applied on F28 and epel7 how I do that when we are
using %autosetup ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
4 years, 3 months
Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2019-02-14 17:00 - 18:00 UTC)
by James Antill
======================
#fedora-meeting-1: fpc
======================
Meeting started by geppetto at 17:00:52 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-02-14/fpc.2019-02...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (geppetto, 17:00:52)
* Schedule (geppetto, 17:04:52)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproje...
(geppetto, 17:04:55)
* #848 Clarify the use of path macros with respect to build dependencies
(geppetto, 17:05:31)
* LINK:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/847#request_diff
(tibbs, 17:12:33)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/8488 (decathorpe,
17:16:14)
* LINK:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/blob/master/f/redhat...
(mhroncok, 17:20:31)
* ACTION: Clarify the use of path macros with respect to build
dependencies PR and tibbs wording (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0) (geppetto,
17:34:14)
* #845 Wiki deprecation status (geppetto, 17:34:33)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:Scriptlets&action=h...
(mhroncok, 17:38:35)
* #846 guidelines/RPMMacros: update for the 21st century (geppetto,
17:41:47)
* Open Floor (geppetto, 17:55:54)
Meeting ended at 18:00:37 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* Clarify the use of path macros with respect to build dependencies PR
and tibbs wording (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0)
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* tibbs
* Clarify the use of path macros with respect to build dependencies PR
and tibbs wording (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0)
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tibbs (68)
* geppetto (46)
* mhroncok (44)
* decathorpe (25)
* zodbot (14)
* redi (14)
* limburgher (7)
* otaylor (7)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
4 years, 3 months
List of 'base' packages that are always present
by Christopher Engelhard
HI,
is there a list of packages that can be assumed to be installed on any
given Fedora system, and thus never have to be listed as dependencies?
I guess this isn't much of an issue in practice, I'm just wondering if
there is a *defined* set of packages that make up a minimal Fedora
install / minimal build environment?
Best,
Christopher
4 years, 3 months
I won't make it to the FPC meeting
by Miro Hrončok
I've promised to lead the FPC meeting today, but I unfortunately won't make it
this time, sorry about that.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
4 years, 3 months