Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Marcela Mašláňová
<mmaslano(a)redhat.com>wrote:
> We need the installation inside the /opt directory because some
> users are using it exactly as Bill mentioned.
>
> Isn't that exactly why we musn't touch anything inside /opt?
It seems reasonable to me that the Fedora project could be both an OS
provider and an add-on provider. In its add-on provider role Fedora
could register a provider name "fedora" with LANANA, and package SCLs
for installation under /opt/fedora/<scl_name>. (I see that "rh",
"rhat", "centos" and "suse" are already registered as
provider names.)
Björn Persson