Wrt. the GNU-Standards, packages with "private" executables
in
in /usr/lib qualify as packaging bugs.
In Fedora reality however, most packages shipping "private" executables
in /usr/lib inherited this either from their RH packaging history
or from their packagers/upstream's ignorance/unawareness on the
GNU-Standards.
I have a package, 'bouml', which invokes private executables placed
inside %{_libdir}/bouml/. Is this serious enough to patch the package
or try to convince upstream to change? The package is somewhat big,
and I would not like to patch it if it was not really needed.
Cheerio,
Debarshi