On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:45 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
As discussed in today's FPC meeting, I've made some changes
to the
Conflicts Draft Proposal to document some acceptable cases, add some
additional valid file name conflict workarounds, and fix the wording
here and there.
FPC Members: Please vote on this draft via email, so we can get this in
place well before the Core/Extras merge. As I wrote the draft, I vote
+1. ;)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Conflicts
This example is doesn't make sense:
<cite>
* Move the man pages into different sections in each package (e.g.
man1/myapi.1.gz and man3/myapi.3.gz)
</cite>
man1 and man3 serve different purposes[1], therefore moving man-pages
from man1 to man3 is not applicable nor advisable.
+1 with the sentence above removed.
Ralf
[1]
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSHAREMANMANUALPAGES