On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 12:07 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
On 7/8/06, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> wrote:
> %perl_sitearch %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installsitearch`"; echo
$installsitearch)
> %perl_sitelib %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installsitelib`"; echo
$installsitelib)
> %perl_vendorarch %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installvendorarch`"; echo
$installvendorarch)
> %perl_vendorlib %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installvendorlib`"; echo
$installvendorlib)
> %perl_archlib %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installarchlib`"; echo
$installarchlib)
> %perl_privlib %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installprivlib`"; echo
$installprivlib)
Okay, I have updated the macros file here:
http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/macros.pear
Let me know if this looks okay.
We have leading-underscoreless %perl_* in rpm, %python_* in spec
templates and upstream rpm, and %ruby_* in the forthcoming ruby spec
template and ruby packaging guidelines; any reason for pear/pecl to be
different?