On Friday 21 March 2008, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
I've added another draft to the todo list:
I doubt we'll get to it on Tuesday, but we'll get to it eventually.
If this passes, it needs a statement what to do with packages that already
use /srv in a way that conflicts with the draft. /srv/foo is typically data,
potentially lots and lots of it, so auto-migrations are practically out of
the question and manual ones are possibly nontrivial amounts of admin work.
Therefore I'd suggest letting them stay as is.