On Friday, 03 October 2008 at 11:48, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 11:34 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri October 3 2008, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> > However, one of my actual point is a bit different: Once one starts
> > formulating such a "template", people will start to nit-pick and to
> > argue on (missing) details (e.g. corner-cases) and in longer terms will
> > start to demand for "laws", "regulations" and
"forms".
>
> I guess we have different pictures about such a template. For me it would be
> an itemized list, where each item is a summary of one guideline from all the
> Guideline documents, maybe with an URL that links to the specific guideline.
> The nit-picking should then only affect the normal guidelines.
Let me put it differently: I am referring to certain particular
people,
of whom I find it very obious that they have no clue about what they are
doing in reviews.
Oh, how I hate such vague accusations. Ralf! Please tell us exactly who
you're referring to and what *exactly* makes you think they have no clue.
Regards,
R.
--
Fedora
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion
http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer
http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"