On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> Dne 4.12.2013 12:37, Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a):
> > (tkinter is actually a subpackage of python itself)
>
> I guess you know what I mean here, but to be clear:
>
> tkinter is only an example, we got more, like pyserial, PyYAML...
Oh, I see. Some time ago, FPC has accepted a change that says, that packages with
"py" in name should be prefixed with "python-" anyway [1]. Since this
only applies to newly created packages, we will have to cope with this, unfortunately. So
my idea of handling this would be:
- all packages must have Provides: python-*
- packages that weren't prefixed with "python-" previously (pyserial,
PyYAML), should also carry an explicit Provides/Obsoletes for the old name.
Sounds good?
What about packages named without the python- prefix for consistency [1]
with other distros ?
Which rule should prevail ?
Dridi
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming
> Other thing:
>
> What about apps? Do we want something in the guidelines that would say:
>
> If the app clearly works with both Python 2 and Python 3,
> then the Fedora package is obligated to use Python 3 instead
> of Python 2.
>
> If however the app only works with one of them, obviously,
> Fedora package uses and requires that one.
>
> Or do we keep that on the packager's decision?
Toshio already proposed a guidelines solution for this [2], but now that I look at it, it
seems that it never got proposed to FPC. Toshio, will you propose that or should I? I
guess we can do this regardless of the change I'm proposing now.
> --
> Miro HronĨok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok
--
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
[1]
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/271
[2]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/python-devel/2013-November/0005...
--
packaging mailing list
packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging