On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:10 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 12:36 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> In this case:
>
> import paste.deploy
> import paste.script
>
> This could reasonably be named python-pastedeploy or
> python-paste-deploy. Do we want to specify that submodules be named one
> or the other or leave it up to the packager?
>
> For what it's worth, Debian has python-pastedeploy but also
> python-twisted-conch so they seem to leave it to the packager ATM.
Up to developer's discretion, IMHO. Look at what upstream calls it.
Sounds good to me. If no one objects today, I'll post that to the bugs
which are waiting for clarification (as this isn't a Guideline change
AFAIS).
-Toshio