On Saturday 07 April 2007, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Friday 06 April 2007 17:53:46 Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Anyone aware of anything else?
It's not just the strip part, but if the library isn't marked executable,
it isn't processed for requirements, so quite often library requirements
can slip through the cracks of rpm's auto req generation.
Oh, indeed, I tested that before posting but the test was faulty; requirements
end up missing indeed (but Provides seem to be fine).