Chris Spencer wrote:
I think the easiest thing to do would probably be to just add
another
check for 'moc-qt4' and fail if it doesn't find either. I guess what I'm
really asking is why it was done like this? Developers expect it to be
under the name 'moc', renaming it without even a symlink is just going
to create problems.
Both qt3 and qt4 provide "moc" (there are other dups, but let's still with
this example). So, a convention that most distros use is to ship moc-qt3
and moc-qt4 (and possibly a 'moc' pointing to one of those).
-- Rex