On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 22:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 04:58:03AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> Additional complications can arise from "shared/common files" and from
> config files (E.g. some *.la's and *.pc's are not unlikely to become
> problematic). They need to be looked after on a case by case basis.
It's annoying that the .pc file includes a libdir=/usr/lib64, else a
-devel (without the .a) could be noarch. :-( As it stands, we won't
be able to install the -devel as multi-arch because all the .h files
will conflict.
Even then it can't be noarch. rpm(build) doesn't allow different archs
for different subpackages.
-Toshio