-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2007, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 16:32 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>> Aloas,
>>
>>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-8756a3bce65
>> 2c376d7ba3908461b638784b6952d
>>
>> states:
>> | There is an exception to this rule. If the upstream source has "py"
>> | (or "Py") in its name, you can use that name for the package.
>>
>> Maybe there should be another exception when upstream includes python it
>> its name, e.g. fuse-python[1]. Should this be packaged as python-fuse or
>> can it stay with upstream's name fuse-python? Should it provide
>> python-fuse in case it stays with its upstream name?
> Does fuse-python have "py" in its name? If so, you can use that name for
> the package. ;)
I would personally call it python-fuse anyway for consistency, and perhaps
add "Provides: fuse-python = VR", but maybe that's just me.
+1
In fact, I remember discussing removing the "py in the name" exception
at one of the meetings. Might not have come to a vote, though.
- -Toshio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG4DncX6yAic2E7kgRAkX7AKCZ3kLAQY8BjeW4mezi50vKRgE5dQCcCPed
tQQRIEWdnye2WfJtVLju2uE=
=zw9B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----