Le Jeu 23 août 2007 15:34, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Jeu 23 août 2007 12:58, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
>
> > Ok, I didn't understood it that way. But it isn't true, the
> guidelines
> > are setup such that having no ownership of a directory is
> impossible.
>
> I'm not so sure. The lax guidelines are more ambiguous, at no time
> do
> they clearly say "every directory must be owned" (with single or
> multiple owners). They say "the rule of thumb is everything must be
Indeed. It would be much more clearer if there was, in addition to all
the explanations, a simple sentence saying, maybe as a conclusion of
all
the examples:
"In any case there should never be any unowned directory appearing
after
a package uninstall."
Who can add this ?
--
Nicolas Mailhot