Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 10:06 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 15:36 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> I posted this proposal awhile back:
>>>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets/iconcache
>> I'm sorry I missed the initial announcement of this. I think your
>> revisions make sense after xdg-utils go into Core and the requirement
>> tree for gtk2 is in place (hicolor-icon-theme should work fine for
>> this). Changing the guidelines before that would break things that
>> currently work. (Or we could place a hard Require:s on xdg-utils until
>> it was fixed.)
> In any case, nothing would break. At worst, gtk apps would
suffer a
> performance penalty, at least until gtk2 is fixed:
>
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/170335
> (a personal packaging pet-peave).
Yes. Which is a regression.
I agree that 170335 should be fixed, though.
Bingo. Bugs should be addressed in their proper domain, and I would
argue strongly that the proper domain in the gtk2 (bug #170335) case is
*gtk2*, not Packaging/Guidelines.
-- Rex