I see that the Licensing page [1] treats LGPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 as the
same, with a short name of "LGPLv2". Also, rpmlint complains about
LGPLv2.1 in spec files. Why is this?
I'm packaging a program [2] that uses 2.1 in the README/COPYING and 2
in the source code headers. I've received clarification on the
license from the author as LGPLv2.1+, but now I wonder if it makes any
difference since the spec tag would be the same in either case.
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
[2]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897