On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 08:56:20AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
On 04/28/2012 04:57 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>What does the Packaging Committee think about the following?
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/759823 is the review request for libkdtree++
>That is a C++ template container implementation, which does not build a
>shared library file to link with, but ships only C++ templates in header
>The resulting -devel package needs to be handled in the same way than
>a -static library package. Whenever there are important fixes in the
>templates, dependencies may need to be rebuilt. Not limited to security
>vulnerabilities. Any bug-fixes in the template implementation would only
>propagate to applications when rebuilding the application packages.
+1, sounds similar to eigen2-devel and eigen3-devel
+1 as well.