On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 14:48 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
Right now I'm thinking:
kernel modules must have kernel-version-release in the package name for
the kernel module - this makes for irritating package naming and cvs
naming but <shrug>
I support this because I haven't seen a better solution. But IMO the
CVS naming is a no go. There should be one dir per one module package
in CVS, not one for each module package for a specific kernel, otherwise
it's a major PITA to maintain. I imagine it isn't too hard to achieve
that.