On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 08:08:50PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 27 juin 2007 à 21:01 +0300, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> I don't see how it would be possible to sanely satisfy all the "do not
> any particular layout", "do not remove locally placed files in /srv"
> and "use /srv as the default location for such data" requirements in
> software, so maybe that's a case in point for not using /srv at all.
Yes, only "filesystem" should mention /srv, e.g. create it.
also layouts that use domains as roots are pretty much ruled out in an
rpm context, so that's not as if we have a choice to make
Yes, but that means more that the rpm setup within /srv is ruled out,
the way you write it may be read as "rpm doesn't support domain
hierarchies, so Fedora setups should not use them" ;)
/srv was really left alone for several Fedora Core releases (only
bittorrent would install there), we should return to that setup (and
also move bittorrent away).
$ ls /srv
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net