Miro Hrončok wrote:
Or is
the "this is RPM, it's always going to be there" argument stronger than the
rules? Is RPM actually always guaranteed to be there?
Well, if RPM somehow isn't there, does it still matter whether a
directory is owned by any RPM package? What does it even mean for an
RPM package to own a directory when there is no RPM keeping track of
that ownership?
Björn Persson