On Tuesday, 13 February 2007 at 18:01, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthias Saou
(thias(a)spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net) said:
> For the ipw2100 and ipw2200 firmwares, do updated written
> permissions still need to be obtained from Intel, or do the current
> ones match these new guidelines? (I'm asking because I always thought
> they both were fine, but they weren't)
The ipw2100/2200 licenses, as written, were deemed OK. (Yes, this
is a change.)
If that is correct, why are #217350 and #217351 still blocking FE-Legal?
Regards,
R.
--
Fedora Extras contributor
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski
Livna contributor
http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer
http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"