On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 04:20:54PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 16:15 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>
> I'd say the reverse than Rex, include the Require manually. But I may
> well be wrong.
Well, you are. If an upstream has its package properly designed (Esp.
uses SONAMEs properly), then there should not be any need to let a
run-time/application-package explicitly require a package by name.
Unless I am wrong, the sonames of 2.8 nad 2.10 are the same, but above
2.10 is needed.
--
Pat