On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:27:51PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 14:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > doesn't make a real difference.
> It does. ;)
> The former installs into $RPM_BUILD_ROOT without doing "rm -rf
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" first. It would need to do this at the beginning of
> %build (!).
hastly off-head scribbled pseudo-code", you know?
The real world case in FE, I am facing this issue with, does have an
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %build ;)
And you consider that proper? This package should not be allowed to
pass the review!
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net