On 13/10/09 02:26 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
2009/10/13 Jeff Johnston<jjohnstn(a)redhat.com>:
> On 13/10/09 11:54 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to build eclipse-ptp for F13 and getting:
>>
>> [eclipse.buildScript] Some inter-plug-in dependencies have not been
>> satisfied.
>> [eclipse.buildScript] Bundle org.eclipse.ptp.rdt.core.tests:
>> [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in
>> org.eclipse.cdt.core.tests_5.0.1.
>> [eclipse.buildScript] Bundle org.eclipse.ptp.rdt.managedbuilder.xlc.ui:
>> [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in
>> org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.xlc.core_5.0.0.
>> [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in
>> org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.xlc.ui_6.0.0.
>>
>> These don't seem to be in our cdt packages. Any reason why? No idea what
>> they are....
>>
>
> We don't ship the tests by default. There is a flag ship_tests which can be
> set to force the eclipse-cdt.spec file to create the package
> eclipse-cdt-tests.
>
> The xlc and c99 stuff has been removed for some time because it relied on a
> binary lpg java runtime jar which was shipped in the CDT without source. I
> have been made aware that there is now an lpg-java package available so I
> will look at changing the build to prereq this.
>
> -- Jeff J.
>
There is indeed, I packaged lpg because it was also an eclipse-dtp
dependency. Presumably you need the same version that is orbit (lpg
1.1), so you'll want to require lpg-java-compat rather than lpg-java.
Thanks for the info.
Unfortunately that version of lpg (version 1.1) is no longer
maintained upstream; what are the chances of getting CDT upstream to
migrate to the newer and more actively maintained lpg 2.0?
I would imagine good if it is just plugging in 2.0 and everything works.
I can try it after I get 1.1 working. If 2.0 requires patches, it may
require some discussion to get them to upgrade.
-- Jeff J.