java-devel May 2010

java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

13 participants
9 discussions

bsf maven questions
by Orion Poplawski 27 May '10

27 May '10

I'm trying to build apache-commons-jexl 2.0.1 in rawhide and am getting: Failed to resolve artifact. Missing: ---------- 1) org.apache.bsf:bsf-api:jar:3.0-beta3 It uses the javax.script API which as I understand it is included in Java 1.6. The jexl pom.xml has:  <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.bsf</groupId> <artifactId>bsf-api</artifactId> <version>3.0-beta3</version> <scope>provided</scope> </dependency> Short of patching that out of the pom.xml file (which works), is there some way I (or something else) should express that bsf-api 3.0 is provided? Or is jexl upstream misguided in adding this dependency? Thanks! -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

3 3

Rebase of log4j with bigger changes
by Stanislav Ochotnicky 18 May '10

18 May '10

Hi, Just a few minutes ago I updated log4j to 1.2.16 (in rawhide). It is now built with maven and there are other changes as well. If your packages have dependency on log4j you might want to know that this change happened. There might be something I missed when re-working the spec file, so if any problems arise don't hesitate to file new bugs. -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com> Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno PGP: 71A1677C Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com

1 0

How to build SRPMs for Rawhide from Fedora 12
by Edmon Begoli 14 May '10

14 May '10

Hi, I am working on a Fedora 12 machine, but I would like to build Java packages for rawhide without necessarily enabling rawhide repository for all the system (it messes with the stable updates). How can I create an RPM build environment for rpmbuild that accesses all the dependencies available in rawhide without affecting the host? Thank you in advance. EB

3 3

Re: [fedora-java] Could someone, please, clarify situation with *-javadoc
by Alexander Boström 08 May '10

08 May '10

(changing lists) fre 2010-05-07 klockan 13:41 -0400 skrev Andrew Overholt: > Hi, > > > Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main package, and > > sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know which is > > correct. > > I don't think it really matters. In some cases, sure, it would be nice > to ensure that the package is around if someone is looking at the API > documentation. Other times someone may only want to peruse the APIs > without installing the implementation. Agreed. Those deps are now removed from the examples in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Abo/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate which I previously submitted as a proposed guideline update. (I hope I submitted it the right way...) Somehow I managed to not notice the java-devel list until recently so I think this is the first time I've mentioned the draft here. Please read and comment on it! The number of changes are growing... I should move it out of the User:Abo namespace so it doesn't look like a personal page. /Alexander

2 2

maven : org.apache.maven:maven-model-v3:jar:2.0 is missing
by Mohamed El Morabity 06 May '10

06 May '10

Hi, I'm trying to package clirr, which is a BuildRequires for the latest version of apache-commons-math. The rebuild of my package fails on the following errors (mvn-jpp is called in my .spec as set in the Java guidelines): [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. Missing: ---------- 1) org.apache.maven:maven-model-v3:jar:2.0 Try downloading the file manually from the project website. Then, install it using the command: mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.apache.maven -DartifactId=maven-model-v3 -Dversion=2.0 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file there: mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=org.apache.maven -DartifactId=maven-model-v3 -Dversion=2.0 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id] Path to dependency: 1) org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-one-plugin:maven-plugin:2.0.8 2) org.apache.maven.shared:maven-model-converter:jar:2.1 3) org.apache.maven:maven-model-v3:jar:2.0 ---------- 1 required artifact is missing. for artifact: org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-one-plugin:maven-plugin:2.0.8 from the specified remote repositories: apache.snapshots (http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository) __jpp_repo__ (file:///usr/share/maven2/repository), central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Total time: 4 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Fri Apr 09 22:33:01 CEST 2010 [INFO] Final Memory: 6M/107M [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yet maven-shared-model-converter seems to be installed: $ rpm -q maven-shared-model-converter maven-shared-model-converter-2.3-3.fc12.noarch Anyway I'm not a specialist of Maven ^^. Any idea about this problem? Thanks :)

2 3

Packaging from JPackage spec - any required changes to license, coordinating with commons rename?
by Edmon Begoli 05 May '10

05 May '10

Hi, I am re-packaging html-unit from JPackage source to Fedora target rawhide for submission for sponsorship. 1) JPackage requires retention of the comments including copyright and license (see Appendix to e-mail). Do I need to do any modifications to it? 2) Following commons packages are required: BuildRequires: jakarta-commons-codec >= 0:1.3 BuildRequires: jakarta-commons-collections32 BuildRequires: jakarta-commons-fileupload >= 0:1.2.1 BuildRequires: jakarta-commons-httpclient >= 0:3.0.1 BuildRequires: jakarta-commons-io >= 0:1.3.1 BuildRequires: jakarta-commons-lang24 BuildRequires: jakarta-commons-logging >= 0:1.1 Packaging rename task specifies Rawhide Fedora 14 as target rename release: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JakartaCommonsRename Should I wait for rename of these for Rawhide Fedora 14 to appache-commons-... before submiting package for review, or should I target earlier release? Please advise.

2 1

jakarta-commons rename
by Stanislav Ochotnicky 05 May '10

05 May '10

Hi, as some of you are aware jakarta-commons changed name to apache-commons some time ago. We should probably start process of renaming these packages in Fedora as well to match upstream. I made a list of -commons components that do not depend on other -commons. This was done with a crude grep of checked out sources so there might be omissions). Owners of packages included: jakarta-commons-codec - mbooth jakarta-commons-launcher - mbooth jakarta-commons-logging - mbooth jakarta-commons-pool - mbooth jakarta-commons-daemon - pcheung jakarta-commons-io - pcheung jakarta-commons-lang - pcheung jakarta-commons-net - pcheung jakarta-commons-collections - devrim jakarta-commons-compress - red jakarta-commons-el - fnasser Starting with these packages should make it easier to continue with the rest (because for those we can already start using new names in Requires). Any ideas/notes are welcome, -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com> Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno PGP: 71A1677C Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com

3 5

WALA available?
by Ankur Sinha 04 May '10

04 May '10

hey, Is WALA[1] available in the fedora packages? Thanks! [1] http://wala.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page -- regards, Ankur - FAS : ankursinha ; franciscod @ Freenode - gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5E9BF638

2 3

Self-introduction - Java QA and Development
by Edmon Begoli 04 May '10

04 May '10

Hi, My name is Edmon Begoli and I am a new active member of the Fedora Project. I am an experienced Java developer, so I am contacting you guys to introduce myself and to offer help in: - testing any Java related packages - it seems that JDK 7 may need a testing owner and I would like to be a point person for this one - helping developing or packaging anything related to Java Thank you in advance and please feel free to engage me in Java related tasks - testing, packaging or development. Edmon Begoli http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/lim http://ebegoli.fedorapeople.org

3 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

java-devel May 2010