Mat Booth wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Andrew Overholt
<overholt(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Seeing the page made me think that the Fedora Eclipse comps group [2]
>> is terribly outdated. Should we be adding our plugins to this group?
>>
> Yeah, we should update it. Let's discuss potential patches here.
>
>
We should at least include all the IDE plugins in the "Fedora Eclipse"
group as optionals to make them 'discoverable,' as it were:
eclipse-birt
eclipse-dtp
I don't like the idea of putting birt and dtp until they are fully
builded. These packages contain only a small part of birt and dtp (as
needed by valgrind) and until they are fully functional , including them
will cause only confusion in users - I installed eclipse-birt but birt
is not available. Let them be pulled by dependencies only when needed.
If we decide to add eclipse-valgrind (soon to enter rawhide) to the list
this wouldn't matter because it requires them.
eclipse-egit
eclipse-epic
eclipse-photran
eclipse-phpeclipse
eclipse-quickrex
eclipse-shelled
eclipse-slide
To the previous I would add:
eclipse-cmake
eclipse-moreunit
eclipse-rpmstubby
Best regards,
Alexander Kurtakov