Andrew Haley wrote:
Gary Benson writes:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
> > It will be invoked from the specfile, but by either
> >
> > a. Going to some java dir and running make, or
> > b. Running some VM-agnostic script that does a.
> >
> > That way, should there ever be some other VM that does
> > precompilation, we need only to add a make rule for whatever it
> > needs.
>
> Ok. FWIW I perfer B, but it's really something for JPackage not
> Fedora to decide. As long as Fedora rpms can continue to call
> 'rebuild-gcj-db' or 'gcj-dbtool --rebuild' until JPackage figure
> out what they're doing then that's fine.
Well, OK: I don't mind. Going through every RPM changing
"rebuild-gcj-db" to "gcj-dbtool --rebuild" and then changing it
again some time in the future sounds like a PITA to me ... but
then I won't be doing it!
It'd probably be best to leave them calling "rebuild-gcj-db" for now,
since we won't be able to get rid of /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db until
we stop caring about people upgrading from FC4.
Cheers,
Gary