Ok,
But did you even try to consider that the analysis tool has bugs?
My situation clearly proves this.
If I may offer to explain this in the form of a requirement that is
either missing or violated:
If a requirement can be satisfied internally within a package then
an external dependency must not be created.
we prefer to not bundle (using tools like jarjar, or
maven-bundle-plugin e.g. Embed-Dependency, Private-Package we use often
<excludeDependencies>true</excludeDependencies>)
My package satisfies all dependencies internally but still external
dependencies are created.
THAT is the real bug.
And it is completely irrelevant that my package contains what Fedora
considers non-free binaries.
On 17/07/16 21:11, gil wrote:
>
>
> Il 17/07/2016 20:10, Ferry Huberts ha scritto:
>>
>>
>> On 17/07/16 20:02, gil wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Il 17/07/2016 19:18, Ferry Huberts ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 17/07/16 19:15, Ferry Huberts wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17/07/16 17:24, gil wrote:
>>>>>> hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i think of no because gradle use ecj (org.eclipse.jdt:core)
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you mean?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As I said, the package is self-contained.
>>>>> I don't want all this analysis.
>>>>>
>>>>> And I don't build it for Fedora as a whole, I build it for
private
>>>>> deployment so the non-free aspect is not relevant for me.
>>>>
>>> really? i not interested to talk about pre-built libraries
>>> i think you should close
>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348689 .
>>> if You want use Your Gradle package is only an Your problem
>>> If someone else as the Gradle maintainer has the time or
>>> inclination to
>>> "devote" to
>>> you this is still one other question.
>>> Your choice has nothing to do with the problems related to the package
>>> maintained in Fedora.
>>
>>
>> Wow, that is rather hostile.
>>
>> You are being openly hostile and I don't understand why.
>> Is it something I said or did wrong?
>>
>> I came here because I was referred here from the bug report.
>>
>> I just want to understand what changed, why the analysis is run and
>> how I can disable it so that my package builds again like it did
>> before.
>>
>> If there is some documentation on the changes and/or specifics of the
>> analysis, then please refer me to it, I'd be happy to read it.
>>
>>
>> I maintain lots of RPMs I deploy into my network and with clients.
>> This reaction to my questions is not helping to convince me to
>> continue doing that.
>>
>> I'm baffled.
>>
>>
> this is not to be hostile or less (in my case not at all) but to be
> objective
> I offer my apologies if you want to accept
> like the advice I've given you so far
> as already written not we use some apis because in Fedora are not
> acceptable, that is NOT FREE. for which we use alternativie that are
> available in our repository. this leads sometimes to have some
> inconvenience (for you only)
> regards
> .g
>>>
>>>> The spec file is here:
>>>>
https://github.com/fhuberts/rpmsUpstream/blob/master/fedora/gradle-upstre...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Details are in the bug report, and I was referred here from that
>>>> report.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI I am an OSGi developer.
>>>>>
>>> i do not care who you are.
>>> best regards
>>> .g
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and in the
>>>>>>
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/gradle.git/tree/gradle.spec#n170
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is listed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and in
>>>>>>
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/gradle.git/tree/gradle.spec#n85
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> use eclipse "osgi" apis (beacuse the OSGi Alliaces
libraries arent
>>>>>> non
>>>>>> free for Fedora)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards
>>>>>> .g
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Il 17/07/2016 17:07, Ferry Huberts ha scritto:
>>>>>>> Hi list,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a custom gradle RPM that I build since fedora 23.
>>>>>>> However, now on Fedora 24 this started pulling in a boatload
of
>>>>>>> 'dependencies' that not actually dependencies since
the package is
>>>>>>> self-contained.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> During the build some kind of osgi dependency analysis is run
that
>>>>>>> results in all these (fake) dependencies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can I turn this analysis off?
>>>>>>> It seems to be new in Fedora 24 because I had no such
problems in
>>>>>>> Fedora 23.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please also refer to
>>>>>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348689 for more
>>>>>>> details,
>>>>>>> including build logs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> java-devel mailing list
>>>>>> java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/java-devel@lists.fedoraprojec...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> java-devel mailing list
>>> java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/java-devel@lists.fedoraprojec...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> java-devel mailing list
> java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/java-devel@lists.fedoraprojec...
>