Braden McDaniel wrote:
Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:21:29 -0500, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Braden McDaniel wrote:
>>>> ld seems not to know about /usr/lib[64]/gcj-4.1.1; and as such
>>>> cannot find libjvm.so without a -L flag. Is this deliberate or a bug?
>>> This is deliberate. You should be dlopen'ing libjvm.so rather than
>>> linking to it directly. To locate it, use
>>> $JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so like you would on other
>>> JVMs. java-1.4.2-gcj-compat symlinks
>>> /usr/lib/jvm/java/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so to libgcj's libjvm
>>> implementation.
>>
>> Fair enough; but I don't want to force my users to set JAVA_HOME. Is
>> this
>> prefix build-time discoverable?
>
> If you're willing to require GCJ's implementation then you can count
> on libjvm.so being located at:
>
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj/jre/lib/$arch/client/libjvm.so
On recent Fedora, perhaps; but I'm inclined not to depend on the
java-1.4.2-gcj-compat in general since I don't know how widely it's
coupled to gcj deployments.
I think fairly widely: recent Debian, Ubuntu and Fedora at least. I think the
above libjvm.so location is fairly reliable, if you ensure that your application
package puts a packaging system requirement on java-gcj-compat (e.g. Requires:
java-gcj-compat).
For FC-7 my plan is to merge java-1.4.2-gcj-compat completely into libgcj so
that this distinction will not exist for subsequent releases.
What I'd like to support is preference for the libjvm relative to
JAVA_HOME at run-time; but falling back to a location established for
libjvm at build-time (if JAVA_HOME is not set at run-time).
> where $arch is the rpm architecture string. To print this string for
> the target system, use:
>
> rpm --eval "%{_arch}"
Not a solution for systems that aren't RPM-based. (But not a problem for
me; autoconf solves this.)
> If you'd like to require any JPackage JRE then the architecture string
> may be a little different (e.g., amd64 vs. x86_64) but the location
> will be:
>
> /usr/lib/jvm/jre/lib/$arch/client/libjvm.so
>
> If you'd like to support other types of JDK installations like /opt or
> /usr/java then you'll have to do a runtime search.
It's looking like my best option is to eke out all the information I can
from libgcj.pc. Assuming libjvm.so is reliably installed in
${libdir}/gcj-${gcj_version} across distributions, I should be able to
get what I need from it.
The problem with this approach is that this directory is versioned. So if you
hard-code /usr/lib/gcj-4.1.1 into your application, it will break when the user
upgrades to gcj 4.1.2. You could do a search for /usr/lib*/gcj-*, but this is
something that java-gcj-compat is intended to do for you; it always keeps its
unversioned libjvm.so symlink pointing to the right place.
Tom