On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 10:29 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
Ziga Mahkovec writes:
> Maybe this could be further improved by creating a single separate map
> for all new jar files (utilizing a new "--unsafe" gcj-dbtool switch
> which triggers the behavior in the patch). Then, only two maps would
> have to be merged, avoiding the need to create 150 separate maps.
What's the problem with creating 150 separate maps? I don't get it.
Fragmentation I guess. Each new map would have to over-allocate enough
space for a jar file to avoid resizing. And somehow a single map seems
like a cleaner solution.
But those are minor issues. Any improvement over the current situation
would help.
--
Ziga