2009/10/13 Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn(a)redhat.com>:
On 13/10/09 02:26 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
>
> There is indeed, I packaged lpg because it was also an eclipse-dtp
> dependency. Presumably you need the same version that is orbit (lpg
> 1.1), so you'll want to require lpg-java-compat rather than lpg-java.
>
Thanks for the info.
> Unfortunately that version of lpg (version 1.1) is no longer
> maintained upstream; what are the chances of getting CDT upstream to
> migrate to the newer and more actively maintained lpg 2.0?
>
I would imagine good if it is just plugging in 2.0 and everything works.
I can try it after I get 1.1 working. If 2.0 requires patches, it may
require some discussion to get them to upgrade.
-- Jeff J.
Well the jar name and the package names have changed, so there will be
a non-zero amount of patching needed. I can't comment on API changes
however.
--
Mat Booth
A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation.
Q: Why shouldn't you do it?
A: Posting your reply above the original message.
Q: What is top-posting?