Pierre Bourgin wrote:
As do/done people of the FedoraProject, I need to choose another tool
(more efficient than rdist ....) to manage my configurations at work.
I've read the Fedora admin ML and see that finally, you choosed the
puppet tool for config. management.
I must have missed a thread of the ML, but I don't find the major
points that made you choose puppet and not bcfg2.
Can someone give me more details on the pro/cons for instance between
these 2 projects, or the missing feature of bcfg2 from the FC
perspective ? It will be a really valuable information for me.
feature set is very similar. The primary reason we chose
puppet over something else is we had a lot of people on the list already
that were familiar with puppet and some people internally at Red Hat
that are eager to help us with questions.