I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
Software Test Engineer at GE Energy
Confirm that you know Patrick Day
After connecting with Patrick, check out:
- Oliver Habicht at Cornell University Library
- Damian Myerscough at Pocket Kings Ltd
- Ahmed Kamal at Canonical Ltd.
(c) LinkedIn 2011
I want to contribute to Fedora as a sys admin. Till now, I have been an
active Assamese localizer for Fedora. I am interested in joining
sysadmin-web fig. Please advice.
Various SSL keys are aging out so we will be updating them before anyone
gets a <This CERT is not valid.> page.
The first server to be updated will be fedorahosted.org.
The old certificate came from Equifax, was a 1024 bit key and had the
The new certificate is issued by GeoTrust, Inc and is a 4096 bit key
with the fingerprint:
Please report any problems with these certificates to
* interim Infrastructure Chief Coffee Officer
just got that mail (see below). Is this an issue someone of you maybe
should take care of? :)
Some additional info: I just took the ownership of the ncmpcpp package.
It was orphaned before, not sure for how long.
-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> Von: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON(a)fedoraproject.org>
> An: dmaphy(a)fedoraproject.org
> Betreff: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
> Datum: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 22:29:22 +0000 (UTC)
> This is the mail system at host pkgs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org.
> I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
> be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
> For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
> delete your own text from the attached returned message.
> The mail system
> <ncmpcpp-owner(a)fedoraproject.org>: host bastion[10.5.126.11] said: 550 5.1.1
> <ncmpcpp-owner(a)fedoraproject.org>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown
> in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
> E-Mail-Nachricht-Anlage, "Undelivered Message"
> > -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> > Von: Dominic Hopf <dmaphy(a)fedoraproject.org>
> > An: ncmpcpp-owner(a)fedoraproject.org,
> > scm-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Betreff: [ncmpcpp] - New upstream release: ncmpcpp 0.5.6
> > Datum: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 22:29:21 +0000 (UTC)
Dominic Hopf <dmaphy(a)googlemail.com>
Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Did something change with the Captcha software this weekend? We got
> several complaints of people unable to register or complete a page
> because it was either unreadable or what they say and typed was not
Well, the infrastructure team runs TurboGears, which provides the captcha :)
I just tried signing up for an account (jds2001testcaptcha) and was
successful in getting past the captcha. I think that the first letter
in the one that was attached was an O, not a C as input by the user
(though I could see the C interpretation as well).
after changing my (mtoman) FAS password and SSH key, I'm not able to SSH
retrace01.fedoraproject.org anymore (pubkey, password). Login to
fedorapeople and fedorahosted works correctly. Could you look at the
problem and possibly renew my access?
Could anybody check the problem, please?
It's been 8 weeks since I reported the issue.
RHN Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Permission denied (publickey)
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:15:41 +0100
From: Tomas Lestach <tlestach(a)redhat.com>
my fedoraproject.org account is: tlestach
My Roles are:
* Signed CLA Group (user)
* Fedora CLA Group (user)
* Spacewalk Git Commit Group (administrator)
When I try to upload a tar.gz to fedorahosted.org:spacewalk, I get:
$ scp /tmp/tito/spacewalk-backend-1.3.20.tar.gz fedorahosted.org:spacewalk
Permission denied (publickey).
According to https://fedorahosted.org/web/faq, I shall have just a
fedoraproject account and a CLA, what I have.
I'm sure, my public key is correct, because I'm a member of one of the
Git Commit Groups and I have no trouble with committing, where the
public key get's verified.
Is there something I miss?
RHN Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
We would very much welcome you as a mirror. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Mirroring, and create an account for yourself in the Fedora Account System, and register your mirror in MirrorManager, our database, at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager . You can enter your own mirror there, and update your information as needed. Within 2 hours of adding your info to the database, you will start seeing traffic.
If you have any questions, please let us know.
Fedora Mirror Wrangler
Dell | Office of the CTO
From: mirror-admin-bounces(a)fedoraproject.org [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Gmail - Pham Duc Hoang
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 9:11 PM
To: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org; fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
Subject: New Fedora Mirror in Vietnam
We launched a new mirror for the project fedoraproject.org. You can add a mirror to the overall list. Below the information about mirror:
* My Company : DIGIPOWER Co.,ltd
* URL of mirror: http://mirrors.digipower.vn/fedora/releases
* Country where the mirror is located: VietNam
* Contact email address: support(a)digipower.vn , duchoang(a)digipower.vn
* Update frequency: 4 times a day
* Rsync repository used: mirrors.digipower.vn::fedora
* Approximate bandwidth: 100Mbps
* IP : 126.96.36.199 .
* Service : HTTP - FTP - RSYNC
* Available content : Fedora Linux 13 - 14
* Architectures : All
Best Regards ,
Mirror-admin mailing list
At today's meeting, we started a discussion of what kind of requirements
we should have for moving some services to externally hosted versions
(like Transifex to tx.net or Wordpress blogs to wordpress.com).
Here's are some initial items that we came up with at the meeting.
While it's often still useful to consider these on a case-by-case basis,
let's get a good list of requirements to talk about when looking at
1) Some level of freeness (unclear where we draw the line)
2) Configuration management
4) Ability to get data out
6) Level of support (for managed hosting like wordpress/tx)
7) Cost (compared to our own maintenance costs)