Need a bit help about gnome applet.
by Eliezer Croitoru
He All,
I am not sure where to start about it.
I have a service that shows some queue information using a xml interface.
I want couple functionalities in a gnome applet but unsure how to start
on it.
- a live feed counters based on the xml file in the applet bar.
(couple counters with different names and change of color by the queue size)
- The queue contains links which can be opened by one software or
another and I want to be able to "pull" from the xml list(another xml
interface) a link(one of 4-5 types which http\https is one of them) and
open it using the appropriate software.
I have started digging about the options and it seems like python is
being used for many things like that.
I am yet to be sure about where to even start about the subject.
Any redirection is welcomed,
Eliezer
9 years, 7 months
Question about DMA speed of eSATA 600 drives.
by JD
Have an external drive, wd20npvx , 2 tb.
It spinsx@7200rpms, and is touted to have 600 gigabit/s
on the wire speed. However, fc20 always connects it as
having dma100, when the esata port supports 300 gigabits/s
So, what's with Fedora to limit it to dma100?
To wit:
[ 3571.062358] ata11: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 0)
.
.
.
[ 3571.063587] ata11.00: ATA-9: WDC WD20NPVX-00EA4T0, 01.01A01, max UDMA/133
.
.
[ 3571.065292] ata11.00: configured for UDMA/100
9 years, 7 months
RE: is it the future?
by J.Witvliet@mindef.nl
Hi,
Ath the moment I don’t have a RHEL-system at hand,
But as long as you can choose between them, there is no problem (most admin’s will probably avoid systemd)
Only when people are _forced_ to use system, and old mechanisms are removed, then problem arises…
Hans
From: users-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Tom Rivers
Sent: woensdag 24 september 2014 16:10
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: is it the future?
On 9/23/2014 18:37, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
Let's decide that before we argue any more on the merits--or lack
thereof--of systemd itself. If it's not going to change Redhat's
decision, then all we can meaningfully discuss here are discovered
issues and any resolutions of same with the current implementation of
systemd.
Fedora has adopted systemd long ago and RHEL has followed that. It is unlikely Red Hat is going to change that direction based on conspiracy theories and personal attacks.
I don't think anyone would expect Red Hat to change direction based on "conspiracy theories and personal attacks". What Dave positied, quite eloquently I might add, is the notion that substantive discussion might influence Red Hat with respect to systemd. Can you speak to that specific point, Rahul?
Tom
______________________________________________________________________
Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het electronisch verzenden van berichten.
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.
9 years, 7 months
is it the future?
by Balint Szigeti
hello all
I've just read this artic.
http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems.html
What do you think guyes?
Does systemd really want to be the 'core-engine' for an OS? It sound
ridiculous for me. As I remember their target was (only) replace the
init, then they did more and more, they pushed the targets over and
over, which is not bad but just think.
1) replace init - get a new process/service scheduler/maintaner
2) write a new logging system.............journalctl
3) hard-code the dhcp and ntp client into systemd... why? just gain the
control.........
maybe there were more, I haven't read everything about systemd......
4) anything could be, like the article... what next? replace the kernel,
write an own X and GUI for only systemd?
and in the future we will have systemd OS for money which was developed
by community and some people just gain the lead and control. They will
displace everything else, and convince the HW and SW vendor
(proprietary) to ship their product to systemd OS then voilà, they win.
I have a bad feeling, systemd will become a 'perfect' OS then the
systemd owners will change the license to commercial and they will just
use the community code (the US lawyers can reach anything) and they will
have a perfect code and get billions of money.
Maybe I have watched too many films but all steps lead to the same
direction.
Balint
9 years, 7 months
Installing btrfs file system on Fedora 21 Workstation
by Lawrence E Graves
I am struggling with how to select the btrfs file system in Fedora 21.
Is this a bug that has not been solved or is it my lack of knowledge in
the installation of the new Fedora 21. Please advise or correct as needed.
--
All things are workable but don't all things work.
Prov. 3:5 & 6
9 years, 7 months
Upgrade to Fedora 21 Alpha yeilds strange results
by Trever L. Adams
This morning I upgraded my test system to F21 Alpha. I need to start
working with it for various reasons. The FreeSWITCH version is largely
the same as was working Friday/Saturday under F20 up to det.
Now, I get similar to the following whenever I do a SIP -> FreeTDM or
FreeTDM -> SIP call.
SIP or FreeTDM to 9664 (music test) yields no problems.
SIP to 9787 (zrtp enrollment) yields no problems.
2014-09-22 14:06:30.189605 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:660 BRIDGE THREAD
DONE [sofia/internal/trevera(a)highcountry.snowyriver.sapphiresunday.org]
2014-09-22 14:06:30.189605 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:498
(FreeTDM/1:5/) State Change CS_REPORTING -> CS_DESTROY
2014-09-22 14:06:30.189605 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_bridge.c:690 Send signal
FreeTDM/1:5/ [BREAK]
2014-09-22 14:06:30.189605 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1388 Send
signal FreeTDM/1:5/ [BREAK]
2014-09-22 14:06:30.189605 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1615 Session 2
(FreeTDM/1:5/) Locked, Waiting on external entities
2014-09-22 14:06:30.189605 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:908 Send signal
sofia/internal/trevera(a)highcountry.snowyriver.sapphiresunday.org [BREAK]
2014-09-22 14:06:30.189605 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1633 Session 2
(FreeTDM/1:5/) Ended
2014-09-22 14:06:30.189605 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1637 Close
Channel FreeTDM/1:5/ [CS_DESTROY]
2014-09-22 14:06:30.189605 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:626
(FreeTDM/1:5/) Running State Change CS_DESTROY
2014-09-22 14:06:30.189605 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:636
(FreeTDM/1:5/) State DESTROY
2014-09-22 14:06:30.189605 [INFO] switch_core.c:2555 Shutting down
2014-09-22 14:06:30.189605 [INFO] switch_core.c:2555 Shutting down
2014-09-22 14:06:30.189605 [INFO] switch_core.c:2555 Shutting down
The last continues ad infititium. The FreeTDM (FXS) is effectively
unusable after this as no dialtone, etc.
This problem exists from remotes/origin/v1.4
04789ae35f18d0d498fc52d2448bc9ae17d9309c and master
4dc7f92aff804447154fde712a312eda67a2e97b.
gcc version 4.9.1 20140912 (Red Hat 4.9.1-9) (GCC)
glibc-2.20-2.fc21.x86_64
kernel-3.16.3-300.fc21.x86_64
openvox_dahdi-linux-complete-2.9.2+2.9.2 w/ patch in
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/DAHLIN-340 for 3.16.2 and later.
Any one else seeing this and figure it out? I did have to remove the
warning from features.h about _BSD_SOURCE and _SVID_SOURCE so that it
would compile (all warnings treated as errors). This is due to those no
longer being supported. The macro, besides warning, defines
_DEFAULT_SOURCE automatically so that all compilation should stay the
same. I only removed the warning.
Thank you for any help. Hopefully, this will be a heads up to those who
can hold off on moving one or more systems over.
Trever
9 years, 7 months
Problem with smplayer
by JD
I have
mplayer-1.1-22.20140414svn.fc20.x86_64
smplayer-14.3.0-1.fc20.x86_64
I cd into a music dir and create a playlist as follows:
find $PWD -name \*.mp3 > play.pls
I then play it with
mplayer -playlist ./play.pls
and it plays just fine.
However, with smplayer:
Click
open->playlist
opens the browse dialog and I select the playlist I just created.
I click on the play button.
No sound, no track names are displayed in the playlist (which is
displayed by clicking on the playlist icon).
So what is the format of the playlist that smplayer is expecting?
Thanx.
9 years, 7 months
problem with log audit fedora
by alireza baghery
hi
i install fedora 20 and join with ipa server (redhat 6.5)
i need log activity users when they uses sudo
i uses damon auditd and configure rsyslog for send log to strm. but strm do
not detect log.
9 years, 7 months
help writing a service file for dropbox
by SternData
There's an init.d file for Dropbox for non-GUI servers. I'd like to use
drobpox as a way to understand systemd a little better.
In the init.d file, it pulls in a list of users from /etc/sysconfig.
I'm trying to figure out how to do something like that with a service file.
My dropbox.service file is:
cat /etc/systemd/system/dropbox.service
---------------------------------------
[Unit]
Description=Dropbox as a system service
[Service]
ExecStart=/home/sdstern/.dropbox-dist/dropboxd
User=sdstern
# 'LANG' might be unnecessary, since systemd already sets the
# locale for all services according to "/etc/locale.conf".
# Run `systemctl show-environment` to make sure.
Environment=LANG=en_US.utf-8
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
---------------------------------------
Ideally, I'd look at a list of users entered in a file in /etc/sysconfig
and loop through ExecStart and User for each user, substituting the user
name for "sdstern" on each.
So, pointers on how to do things like this in a .service file?
--
-- Steve
9 years, 7 months