On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Stephen Gallagher
<sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> [1]
https://github.com/libre-server/proposals/pull/1
I'm confused by the above. It seems that we're being asked to include
Fleet Commander and desktop configuration management workflows.
AIUI, this role is exclusively for the server side, and to have
clients be *able* to talk to it - not assisting in the configuration
of any such clients. Of course, if there are requirements of the
server in order for Fleet Commander to function optimally, then those
are appropriate for this role. However, this seems to impose
requirements that the Server SIG is incapable of fulfilling.
Note that I'm not saying that this is invalid in any way, simply that
it's outside the scope of what the Server SIG is capable of
overseeing. There's obviously plenty of value in providing client
automation as well.