V Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 11:24:04AM +0200, Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 10:56 AM Vít Ondruch vondruch@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 07. 06. 23 v 20:49 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
>> Fabrice Creuzot code@luigifab.fr writes:
W: unable to load spellchecking dictionary for fr.
There is a French version of the package %description (%description -l fr) but you do not have a French dictionary installed so rpmlint cannot do a spelling check. I believe installing hunspell-fr would help, or you can ignore the complaing.
awf-gtk4.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary awf-gtk4
rpmlint --explain no-manual-page-for-binary says "Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page."
So the package installs an executable named "awf-gtk4" is installed, but no corresponding manual page is installed. It is nice if all executables have manual pages, and you should check the source to make sure that it doesn't include one which somehow isn't being installed, but otherwise your options are:
- See if someone else has written a manual page which you can include.
- Write one yourself.
One option to consider is to use help2man:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-puma/blob/rawhide/f/rubygem-puma....
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-puma/blob/rawhide/f/rubygem-puma....
Does it actually make sense to do that though? If the contents of the manpage is just a duplicate of the output of "$binary --help", does it serve any purpose (except inflate package size)?
No. It's not helpfull.
-- Petr