Am Dienstag, den 08.09.2009, 08:26 -0400 schrieb Andrew Overholt:
Hi,
* Christoph Höger <choeger(a)cs.tu-berlin.de> [2009-09-07 07:41]:
>
> It looks to me as if rebuilding bsf with version 2.4.0 and including a
> build requires on jython would be enough.
Sounds fine to me. Does anything strictly need bsf < 2.4.0? I realize
nothing will have a strict Requires <= but we should at least try to
build the direct packages that need bsf to verify that they still build
with 2.4.0.
So I will proceed by building bsf 2.4.0 for f11, ok? I just don't know
if I should just rebuild any packages that depend on bsf ... Is there a
way to inform the maintainers?