I made a hasty -1 in the meeting channel yesterday. and I feel its important to 'admit
when one is wrong' - so there it is.
I actually should have just asked fcami directly about the concerns I had. Because when I
finally had this discussion, my concerns were rested.
I'm +1 for probationary bot-ops for fcami - I think he will be an asset to #fedora and
the community.
Dave Riches
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Fenzi
[mailto:kevin@scrye.com]
To: irc-support-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent:
Fri, 20 Aug 2010 20:41:57 +0100
Subject: Re: plan for tomorrow's
irc-support-sig meeting (2010-08-19)
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 03:54:00 +0100
Clive Hills <discordianuk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Sadly, very sadly
> I would like to see the following items on next week's agenda:
>
> - Why can non-#fedora ops nominate #fedora ops
I would rephase that as: "who can nominate someone as a #fedora op".
Should we allow self nominations?
Should it be only any existing #fedora op?
Should it be more than one existing #fedora op?
We can add this to the meeting next week...
> and with pleasure :-
>
> - I'll propose fcami for a trial op
I would say +1 here. He's been very visible in the channel, he's been
very helpful to people. He knows what he's talking about, and is
involved in other areas of Fedora, so knows where to send people, etc.
I also think he's been helpful and provided good ideas for the feedback
issues, and would like to see him contribute more and add his voice and
votes to issues we vote on.
kevin