----- "Kevin Fenzi" <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
I would rephase that as: "who can nominate someone as a #fedora op".
Should we allow self nominations?
Should it be only any existing #fedora op?
Should it be more than one existing #fedora op?
We can add this to the meeting next week...
This is a simple effort it would appear to eliminate a few ops from having a voice because
I am willing to be a "trouble maker" or "asshole" or "dink"
or "troll" or "illogical", these are the names I have been called
since this issue and the #fedora users I choose to nominate have come up. I am not sorry
that I feel those that are perhaps not the "favorite sons" may be good ops and
good to have involved in establishing the ops feedback process. I do not feel that we
should be adding ops mid stream of that task, this should not however prevent us from
aligning added ops for once that process is complete.
-- Bob
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robert 'Bob' Jensen || Fedora Unity Founder |
| bob(a)fedoraunity.org ||
http://fedoraunity.org/ |
|
http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/ |
|
http://blogs.fedoraunity.org/bobjensen |
|
http://www.facebook.com/rpjensen |
------------------------------------------------------------------------