#136: Unban dan408/vicodan from #fedora-social
-----------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: vicodan | Owner:
Type: feedback | Status: reopened
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Version: | Severity: Neutral
Resolution: | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
-----------------------+-----------------------
Comment (by bjensen):
Just for the record I will '''NEVER''' give removing a ban of Dan
from
#fedora-social a +1. I do not wish to deal with him '''EVER'''.
This ticket was discussed and a consensus was reached that it is better
for the overall "health" of the channel that the ban remain not to mention
the mental health of those tasked with being channel operators. We don't
like to ban people, we hate it, there are just some people that give us no
other choice. The policy of removing bans for no reason other than time
past works well for some but there are cases that just don't justify the
added work required from the volunteers who manage the channels. It is my
opinion that this is one of those cases.
He was asked above "Dan why do you want to be back in #fedora-social while
you were there you did nothing but showed you had no respect for yourself
nor others in the channel." and he never answered. If he can't justify
removing the ban why should we? Rather than asking what he needs to do,
why not ask him what he has done to justify removing the ban?
In discussing this ticket I have heard the arguments "Oh just give him
another chance, he will screw up again." and "I'm just sick of hearing
about it to the point I just don't care." Both are poor reasons to remove
a ban IMO. I have a hard time thinking of anyone that has been banned and
given another chance more times from both #fedora and #fedora-social than
Dan. That alone should speak volumes.
--
Ticket URL: <
https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig/ticket/136#comment:8>
irc-support-sig <
irc://irc.freenode.net/#fedora>
Feedback and tracking of issues for the folks who try and improve support in #fedora on
irc.freenode.net