#108: Proposal for Ammendment to the IRC Support SIG Policy
-----------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: dp67 | Owner:
Type: feedback | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Version: 2.0 | Severity: Neutral
Resolution: | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
-----------------------+-----------------------
Comment (by bjensen):
Commenting inline...
Replying to [comment:13 kevin]:
Is there some way we could get a diff against the current content?
It is pretty much a new document expanding on the current.
it's kind of hard to note all the changes when reading a
completely
separate comment.
Some general comments:
* I'd avoid even mentioning the irc-support-operators FAS group, unless
we clearly define who it contains. I think it probibly should just be
deleted unless it serves some kind of function.
I think this has been cleared up in this
[[https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dp67/sandbox/irc-
sig&oldid=289330|revision]].
* The paragraph with "All tickets requiring a vote must have 2
meetings"
still reads very dense and difficult to me, I think we might be able to
simplify it some.
> Tickets which require a vote have two phases:
> * The discussion phase: This happens at the meeting following the ticket
being filed, and optionally at the discretion of the ticket filer or
meeting chair, additional meetings to allow for sufficient discussion.
> * The voting phase: Once at least one discussion meeting has happened
(and optionally additional ones), votes will be taken in the ticket and
the next meeting, after which the issue shall be decided and the ticket
closed.
> The ticket will be updated noting when each phase is in progress.
This is also in the above linked revision.
Other than that, it looks good. I like the additional info at the
bottom
too!
--
Ticket URL: <
https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig/ticket/108#comment:14>
irc-support-sig <
irc://irc.freenode.net/#fedora>
Feedback and tracking of issues for the folks who try and improve support in #fedora on
irc.freenode.net