On 19/07/16 14:08, Fred Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:00:25PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Joachim Backes wrote:
>> I'd say, UnitedRpms is a (better, more actual)
replacement for rpmfusion.
> What does "more actual" mean?
> Is it more likely to be compatible with CentOS and EPEL?
well, I don't know what the OP means, exactly, but as of the last
time I looked, rpmfusion did NOT have an EL7 repository, so if this
UnitedRpms does, maybe it is "actual" instead of "virtual".
I suspect it means 'actuellement' > 'current, up to date'
I've always used rpmfusion with epel on my Centos systems, but since
rpmfusion doesn't have EL7, I've gone with the nux repos.
The website says f24/f25